FuturesTechs Blog

We always welcome feedback from clients and free trialists here at FuturesTechs, so we can strive to provide the best possible service to aid your trading decisions.

I thought I’d use the Blog to answer publicly a few questions we have been asked of late, so here goes with one:

Dear Clive,

Re buying Technical Analysis, I always find myself thinking the same question: “If it were that easy/obvious……’we’ve been bullish almost right from the start of the recovery’……….’gearing up for a sell-off’…… why do analysts like yourself not just make loads of money trading futures or spreadbetting?

If I found it that easy/made so much money I wouldn’t bother selling my levels…

Regards,

RJ

This is a question I’m often asked, especially at Seminars. People are, quite rightly, confused that I appear to be so well equipped to trade the markets, yet I don’t.

I think there are several reasons why I don’t trade, so let’s try and go through a couple.

1. It could be argued that YOU wouldn’t want me trading, because then I would be skewing my comments and ideas around my own position. If the market was clearly going down but I’d been caught with a long position I might be trying to talk it up, convinced that my position was right, and the market was wrong. The problem with this is that the market’s never wrong! But I am a human being, so I am subject to emotions just like you, and fear of cutting a wrong or losing position is one of the most powerful (negative) emotions in trading. The flip side to this argument is also pretty valid, though. The idea that an analyst should be able to trade their views put their money where their mouth is has merit, sure. The problem I’ve found with this is that good analysts generally don’t make good traders. I’ll come back to this notion in point 4.

2. I don’t have time. I run a growing company that’s trying to reach out to all sorts of traders, through seminars, increasing product breadth, and finding new delivery methods to take the product to a wider audience. Not only that but the day-to-day analysis takes a good chunk of time each day as well, starting nice and early at 5.30am each morning (although I’m not on my own, it must be said!). So I don’t feel I have the proper amount of time to devote to trading. I don’t think this is something you can do properly with 20 minutes work a day, and if you believe in those ads that tell you this then maybe you should think about the old “if it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is” rule.

3. I haven’t made (consistent) money before as a trader. I have had a go at trading a few times. In 2001 I worked in a Trading Room in the City for a year. It was a “Prop” room with a bunch of short term traders doing “high frequency” trading. These guys were happy to make a tick on a trade, and did at least 50 trades a day. Whenever I had a position on in the Bund Futures that was more than 5 ticks onside the rest of the guys couldn’t believe I was still in the trade. I wanted to run it for another 10 or 20 ticks, but found myself taking the smaller profit. In other words I allowed what was going on around me to affect my trading decisions - Bad mistake. The other problem was that my trading was fitted around writing the analysis. I would write the analysis from 5.30am to 8am, then trade until 10.30am, the write the analysis from 10.30am ‘til midday, then start trading again. - Oh dear! The result? I broke even, so lost money over the course of a year, when taking into account expenses like the cost of the desk and the professional trading software.

Then in 2005 I put some money into an account to have a go at trading UK Equity CFDs, all the while continuing with my daily analysis, as well as providing stock tips for a CFD firm. I lost most of my stake because I was long of a bunch of stocks one week in a nasty bear move, when my FuturesTechs FTSE report was as bearish as it could be… So I was bearish in my view, but bullish in my positions. Pretty dumb, huh?!

I closed this account down, deciding that trading wasn’t for me, which brings me on to my final point, because so far, re-reading what I’ve wrote, it sounds like a bunch of lame excuses. There is a much more important reason why I’m not a trader.

The main reason I don’t trade?

4. I don’t enjoy it, or maybe I’m just not cut out for it. I am an emotionally highly charged person. I am extremely passionate about what I do. I am also extremely self-critical. I hate it when I get the market wrong when I’m writing about them, and I’m 10 times worse when I’m trading. I turn into a total pain in the butt, and my wife likes me even less than usual! During the two stints when I was trading I found my mood swings to be unpredictable, I found my home life was affected; snapping at the kids, and finding a quiet corner of the house to have a sulk when my P&L wasn’t going the way I wanted to. I don’t like being this person. While I care passionately about the markets, about Technical Analysis, and the FuturesTechs product, I don’t wish to jeopardise things that are far more important.

So my own personal journey of discovery has led me to make the firm decision that trading’s not for me, and that I am far better cut out to analyse the markets, and continue to aid real traders (who can manage their emotions!!) to trade the markets using Technical Analysis, one of the most powerful tools available to anyone who wishes to make a success of trading.

I’m happy to admit that I’m not a good trader then, which is possibly why I’m doing okay as an analyst, because there is a school of thought that a good trader will never be a good analyst, and vice-versa, just because we’re all “wired up” differently.

Next time I’m going to talk about some more technical stuff; we’ve had a few questions from readers about gaps, and how to trade them.

In the meantime if you are a FuturesTechs member and have any questions that you think would be suitable for a “public” answer then feel free to ask away!! (Click here).

If you wish to have a look at our service please click here to request a free trial.

We included the RSI and Parabolic SAR indicators in the new levels sheet available in our Members Area, so thought that it would be worthwhile to briefly introduce them to anyone who might not be familiar with how they worked or how to use them.

Fig 1: The New Levels Sheet. (Click to enlarge)

RSI (Relative Strength Index)

One of the most popular oscillators, the Relative Strength Index was first introduced by J. Welles Wilder in his popular, now-classic book, “New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems” (Trend Research, 1978).

The calculation might not look intuitive, but it really isn’t too complicated:

where RS is the “Relative Strength” of up days versus down days over the period being used (typically fourteen).

As originally calculated by Welles Wilder, the strength of up days is calculated as follows: for each day, “Up” is recorded as: the difference between the close and the prior close if there was on increase, or as zero if there wasn’t. “Down” is recorded similarly: the size of the difference between the close and prior close (always a positive number) if it decreased, or zero if it didn’t. The exponential moving averages of “Up” and “Down” are calculated, with the EMA of “Up” then divided by EMA of “Down” to give us the Relative Strength.

RSI is bounded in the range 0-100, and the use of the exponential moving averages makes it reasonably smooth, solving two issues which often arise with oscillators (for example: the simple Momentum indicator - the difference between latest close price and the price n periods ago - is neither smooth nor bounded, making for volatile swings which can’t be compared across markets).

The key takeaways from RSI are:

The ideas that hold true for oscillators in general hold true with the RSI. The oscillator will frequently turn around before the price does – for example, a price still rising that is accompanied by a falling RSI produces a bearish divergence between price and oscillator, a major warning that the up trend is running out of steam (see Fig 2 below).

Fig 2: NASDAQ Futures, September 1999 – May 2000. Divergence between price and RSI at the height of the bubble. (Click to enlarge)

It’s worth reinforcing that extreme RSI readings do not by themselves constitute buy or sell signals. For example, the most that a high RSI, even one above 70, can indicate is that if the market is ranging, it is now due for a correction. The sell signal won’t actually be produced until RSI starts declining back toward neutral levels, and if the market is trending instead of ranging, then it could stay at elevated levels for extended periods of time. As with any indicator, trader discretion is advised.

When looking at our levels sheets, simply checking whether the RSI is above or below 50 tells you something about the internal strength of that market. Additionally, we highlight the figure in yellow if it is in one of the extreme overbought/ oversold zones. A cluster of extreme overbought/oversold markets in the same sector of our equities, commodities or Forex sheets provides interesting information about general market trends, while also helping us to identify specific opportunities.

Parabolic SAR

Another invention by Welles Wilder, the Parabolic Stop-and-Reverse is designed as a trailing stop system with a difference. Originally called the Parabolic Time/Price System, the stop is calculated as function of price and time.

The SAR alternates between providing stops for shorts and longs, switching as soon as a stop is activated. In the chart above, the blue marks are the stops for shorts, with the red marks the stops for longs. As you can see, this system is “always in”, meaning that it always indicates an uptrend or a downtrend (depending on which type of stop was the last one to be activated), so that somebody who focused exclusively on it would always have a position in the market. This makes it unsuitable for ranging markets, where a trader using it would be constantly whipsawed (see Fig 3 below).

Figure 3: NASDAQ Futures, January - May 2009. Whipsawed until mid-February, and then helpfully following the trends. (Click to enlarge)

The stop is calculated by:

Today’s SAR = (Yesterday’s SAR) + (Acceleration Factor)*(Yesterday’s Extreme Price – Yesterday’s SAR),

where yesterday’s extreme price is the high in a downtrend, or the low in an uptrend, and the Acceleration Factor is a fraction which increases incrementally each day up to a maximum value, providing the distinctive parabolic shape (this is the part of the formula incorporating time).

The recommended use of the Parabolic SAR is as a stop in a trending market where other, primary tools of analysis have originally motivated the trade. The stops which it provides won’t rush to the price action too quickly at the start of a serious move, thus giving it some initial time in which to develop. However, the increasing “Acceleration Factor” means that it will pick up speed when it isn’t activated, until it races quickly towards the price. This means that when the trend does eventually lose momentum, it will quickly catch up with the price and close out the trade.

Our levels sheets provide the SAR stop in green if it’s the stop in an uptrend, or in red if it’s the stop in a downtrend. Again, simply browsing which sectors are predominantly in uptrends or downtrends according to the SAR provides useful information, even if you aren’t using the stops in trading a specific market.

A Note on Parameters

Note that as with all indicators, the parameters of the RSI and the Parabolic SAR can be tailored to suit the individual markets under consideration. Our levels sheets use the most commonly used parameters for each indicator (14 periods for the RSI, an acceleration factor of .02*(t) up to a maximum of .2 for the Para SAR), for the same reason that we look at 10, 20 and 50-day moving averages: besides being reasonable parameters to use most of the time in their own right, they are the parameters that a majority of people automatically use anyway, and therefore gain technical significance purely on that basis.

Other Indicators, Other Markets?

The levels sheets are there to assist our members and if there are particular indicators and/or markets which you would like to receive automated levels for, please let us know and we’ll do our best to include them. While automated indicators and levels are never going to be a trader’s panacea, when incorporated into an overall strategy they are a key ingredient of successful trading.

Graham Neary (graham@futurestechs.co.uk)

Neither, I suspect, is the answer to the above question, at least not as far as where we are at this very moment is concerned:

We have been bullish since early March, and have seen the market “climbing the wall of worry” as we predicted, with no-one quite believing the rally. We are not doing the “Harry Hindsight/told you so” bit here. Just ask one of our clients, or feel free to check our “Media” page on our website and listen to what we’ve said on CNBC in recent months.

But just now everyone (else) we seem to see and hear on CNBC and Bloomberg TV is getting bullish. So we’re starting to think we’re near a top for now on that basis (when too many people are getting bullish it’s time to find the exit!), and the last few days have seen some pretty uncertain price action to back this up.

When I say “starting to think we’re near a top” I don’t mean the top of a bear market rally, though. We think there will be a pullback some time soon, which may well last the whole summer (“Sell in May and go Away” is a pretty watertight strategy if you don’t take it completely literally, and if you exercise some finesse or process re timing your “sell”!). During this time you will see many commentators saying “told you so” with respect to the bear market rally story (probably the same guys who this week have been saying we’re going up; Hmmm…).

But we will not make a new low. In fact we don’t think the S&P will drop below 766, or the Dow below 7240 , and we will look for the FTSE 100 to hold above 4000 or at worse 3850 on any retracement move. The sell off will only go on long enough to get the weak longs panicking out, and only long enough to have the “bear market rally” camp saying “told you so”. THEN we will start to rally again, and we will end 2009 in fine fettle.

Our customers will benefit from knowing if and when our views change, because we WILL happily change our skew if we are proved wrong, such is the flexibility of a short term approach utilising Technical Analysis.

For now I am preparing to “Sell in May…” and it will be interesting to see what happens this week, prior to my appearance on CNBC on Thursday evening (May 14th). For now key supports are holding and we’re still short term Bullish, but this could change very quickly, and evidence is mounting in favour of a pullback.

We are often asked how we use Fibonacci retracements, and what time frames they are best used on.

Let’s look at the FTSE Futures chart right now to try and give a flavour of how they can help us.

Since last Tuesday (as we suspected, and as was flagged to our clients) we have seen a recovery rally in the FTSE from the lows just above 3450 set at the start of March.

There have been many commentators who are calling this a “bear market rally”, and are waiting for the first signs of weakness to pounce upon and use as a selling opportunity. As our customers know we’re not quite in this camp, but there you go. We have an article recently written in our members area that expands on our thoughts as to whether this is a market bottom or not.

Anyway, back to our magic Fibonacci numbers.

The Fibonacci retracements commonly watched are 38.2% and 61.8%. If a market has been selling off then we always call off the hounds on the down-leg if we can retake the 38.2% level, at which point we target a move to the 61.8% level. In this instance, as the market started rallying off the lows we looked up to see where the market would have taken back 38.2% of the weakness seen since the start of the year (see chart 1). This level was 3904. We got to here this morning… and promptly fell over.

Chart 1: FTSE Futures Daily Candlestick chart since the start of 2009

So does that mean we’re right back in bed with the bears and looking for a fresh test of the lows? It could well be, but the slightly more cautious can use Fibonacci levels on a shorter term chart to help them with that one as well, because it could be argued that unless we give back 38.2% of the recovery, then maybe the recovery is still going on!

So we start at the low and measure up to the high and find the 38.2% retrace of that move. This is 3738 (and coincides with Friday’s low) so we are using this level as a reference now to see what the market wants to do next. A break below here and sure, the bears are back in charge, and we’ll look to head back down, targeting 3625 (the short term 61.8% retracement) first, then 3443 (the year’s lows), as per the second chart, below.

Chart 2: FTSE Futures, Hourly Candlestick Chart, 9th - 18th March

So you can see we use Fibonacci levels on lots of different time-scales, and they can all have a use in telling us where we are, and what the market’s thinking.

Be safe,

Cheers,

Clive.

I have been bearish of this market for a good while now and it’s proved fruitful, but today I am thinking that shorts should be covered.

Why, when the Dow has just printed it’s lowest price since 1997, would I suddenly start to think bullish thoughts?

Because I read the papers and listen to the financial news channels, and upon making this new multi-year low the world seemed to collectively shrug it’s shoulders. Ambivalence is the order of the day? Dow to 6000? Yeah, why not (you hear people say in a resigned tone).

(The FTSE is faring slightly better, holding above last years low for now, and when I trawl through the FTSE 100 stocks I see many stocks that are nowhere near making new lows compared to last years)

If you are regular readers of this Blog you’ll recall the “Sentiment Cycle” chart we posted back in October. Here it is again.

This was first published in a book called “The Nature of Markets” by a New York based Technical Analyst, Justin Mamis, back in 1991.

Note that the bottom of the cycle, when markets ultimately bottoms out, is “Discouragement” - -I think that’s what it feels like now…. and I think we’re hitting bottom.

Remember, when everyone’s sold who’s gonna sell, when everyone’s short who can be short, there’s no one left to sell it, and the market cannot go down any more if there aren’t any sellers left!

Have we got the banner headlines of doom, gloom and despair on the front cover of things like Newsweek and the like? Are Taxi drivers telling you that the Stock Market is finished? Let me know!!!

Be Safe,

Cheers,

Clive.

“Candlestick Charts - An introduction to candlestick charts”, Clive Lambert’s first (maybe not last!) book has recently been released, and you can get your copy now.

Early feedback has been positive. Thank you to those who have already got their copy, and thank you to those who have offered their thoughts

To order your copy we have set up a link (Click here) via the FuturesTechs website to the Global Investor bookshop; the easiest way to get hold of the book, with a decent discount to boot! There are plenty of other titles to peruse as well, so feel free to bookmark the page once you’ve ordered!

Alternatively we are giving away signed copies of the book to new subscribers to the FuturesTechs website when you sign up for 6 or 12 months. As well as the book there are discounts offered for these extended subscription periods. Please Click here to join up and secure your signed copy!

If you are tired of listening to bottom pickers telling you that Bank and Mining Stocks are cheap, then maybe it’s time to subscribe to FuturesTechs and get some real, useful advice, without the bias attached to fundamentals. For example we’ve been very bearish of the Equity markets since Monday morning, and our readers are making money on the short side! Even prior to Monday’s technical sell signal we had been warning that the recovery trade was on a rocky footing.

We are beta testing several new additions to the website at present and will keep you posted as and when these become available.

Cheers,

Clive.

We were asked by a trader today (like we often get asked with respect to Banking Stocks) where a good place to buy Barclays would be? For those looking at this after the event let me briefly set the scene:

Barclays topped out just shy of £8 in February 2007. Last week we hit 47p, and have since bounced, failing at 117.50 yesterday (28th January). Interestingly, this was the low/bounce back in November, so we have seen an old support level turning into resistance, something us Technical Analysts always look out for, and place importance upon.

All the way down we have been asked if it is a good time to buy banks, and all the way down we’ve said “No”.

Our clients who have access to all of the media appearances and magazine articles featuring our Analysts will be well versed with our thinking, and our standard response to these sort of questions, but the reply I crafted to today’s chap caused a bit of a chuckle around the office, as well as clearly illustrating our thoughts on this question.

So I thought I’d share it with you! Here it is:

_________________________

1p is the only safe place to buy BARC!!!

Yesterday’s failure at old support at 117.50 is a clear signal that the road to higher prices is going to be a tough one in this stock.

Failing to hold £1 today is bad news, surely?!

85p-88p might act as support.

This isn’t catching a falling knife, it’s catching a falling FRIDGE.

You don’t need Technical Analysis for this sort of trade; just jump in and cross your fingers…

Casinos give you free tea/coffee/lemonade, and in Las Vegas you can even get free beer… much more fun than “trading” Barclays.

__________________________

Good luck today with whatever you decide to do, be it in the markets or down the Casino!!

Cheers,

Clive.

PS. We are currently offering significant discounts on website membership if you join for 6 or 12 months. Click here for details!

We often get asked “How can I use your product?”

FuturesTechs provides support and resistance levels to professional traders across a range of different Futures markets. They use our levels as the basis of their day trading.

Unfortunately I often come across traders using them in different ways, so it’s tough to give a definitive answer to that question. We are all different, and do things in different ways, and the individual’s interpretation of the levels we produce is no exception.

Let me make something clear right now. A lot of what we do here at FuturesTechs is basic common sense. We are almost “reporting” the technical news.

Take today’s FTSE Futures price action as an example. In our report this morning we talked about how important resistance at 4220 was, and we made this a bold level to make sure our readers got the message!

It was a VERY obvious level, being Friday’s high: Quite simple, unless you decided to ignore the simple and obvious.

It gave us the high this morning, not once but twice.

The low between these two highs was 4174, so we got a sell signal (Double Top) on the short term (eg 10 minute) charts once this gave way. We had 4163 posted as our first support, so on the way back down (if you hadn’t sold at the bold resistance at 4220) there were two more opportunities to sell; once we broke 4174, or even safer once we sold off through 4163.

Where to get out? We had a bold “area” of support at S5 in today’s report, between 4051.5 and 4064.5. The lunchtime low was 4066.5, where we suddenly started posting reversal candlestick on our trusty 10 minute chart - time to cash in.

Hopefully this gives some insight into how one can use technical levels to help decide where you put on trades, and where you get out.

Ideally you should aim to create trades with a basic set of criteria.

• Trade in the direction of the overall trend.

In other words In a downtrend sell ahead of an important resistance with a tight stop if it breaks.

Buy ahead of a key support level in a rising market.

• Targets should be acheivable, especially considering the current market conditions. It is Martin Luther King Day in the US today, so large swings of volatility are unlikely.

• Targets should also not be “blocked” by large resistance or support levels. For example if you decide to buy a Stock at £1.03 with a stop at 99p then you want to have a target of at least £1.11, to give a 2:1 reward to risk ratio: You are planning to make twice as much as you’re willing to lose - the way it should always be.

But if £1.10 is an old high on several occasions it is hopeful at best to ask the market to trade £1.11, so you have set a target that’s going to be tough to achieve.

Whenever you’re looking for trades to put on you want to try and skew things so that it’s going to be tough to get stopped out, but much easier to head to your target.

This doesn’t mean you’re not ever going to get stopped out, it just means you’re stacking the odds in your favour. This is what Technical Analysis does, and what we hope to help YOU to do when you use our service for YOUR trading decisions.

And one last thing while we’re talking about stops. RESPECT YOUR STOP. It is very easy to move a stop further away if a market’s getting near to triggering your loss. If you have set a stop, then LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS!

So far 2009 has been a tough year to call. Volatility has dropped, but we haven’t gained any firm directional traction yet in most anything. Although it goes against our usual mode of operation to give longer term calls we are still happy with our overall view for Equity markets for 2009; that we will make a new low in the early part of this year, but end the year quite a bit higher than where we are now…

For this blog post we welcome a guest writer, Stephen Desborough, who has worked in the Futures industry for many years as a trader and is now a Performance Coach. He has helped many traders with his in depth knowledge of methods like NLP, approached from a traders point of view.

stephen@performance-coach.co.uk is his e-mail address if you wish to contact him.

Thanks for your contribution, Steve, and Season Greetings to you all!

Cheers,

Clive.

_____________________________________________________________

As the nights and the year draw in, it is a perfect time to reflect back on 2008. As you look back, hopefully you will be able to relish in your accomplishments and the growth that you have made both professionally and personally.

Did you set any goals for 2008? Did you achieve all of the goals that you set for yourself? If for some reason you’ve fallen short, then ask yourself, “why?”. Is there something that you could have done differently, or is there something that you should have done, but for whatever reason you didn’t?

During this special time of festivities, and a well deserved break, spend some time brainstorming the past year and the year ahead. What do you want to achieve in 2009? What is important to you? What are your goals? How are you going to achieve them?

In 1953, researchers surveyed Yale’s graduating seniors to determine how many of them had specific, written goals for their future. The answer: 3%. Twenty years later, researchers polled the surviving members of the Class of 1953 — and found that the 3% with goals had accumulated more personal financial wealth than the other 97% of the class combined.

Some of the reasons that many of us do not set goals:

• Not being serious about your goals. Until you become completely serious about your goals, your chances of success are limited.
• I don’t know how to clearly set out my goals. “As I don’t know how to do it or what I really want. I wont bother”
• The fear of failure. “What happens if I do not achieve my goals?”
• The fear of success. “How will I cope with success and will other peoples perception of me change”

If you have no goals, you are not going anywhere. This is a key reason why people do not achieve their full potential.

So it is important to GAIN DIRECTION IN YOUR LIFE AND DEFINE YOUR DESTINATION.

Even people who do set goals, do not always get the result that they intended. Here is a technique that will help you towards setting and achieving your goals. The SMART criteria.

• S. The more SPECIFIC, that you make your goals the more chance you have of it happening.
• M. What has to happen ? what do you have to see, feel, to know, so that you can MEASURE your success ? Make sure that your goals are MEANINGFUL to you.
• A. State your goal in the present tense. AS IF you are already living the ACHIEVEMENT of the goal.
• R. Make sure that your goal is REALISTIC to you. What degree of certainty do you have to make this goal happen.
• T. Have a precise TIME of when you will have achieved the goal. Make sure that your goal is what you do want as opposed to what you don’t want. eg. “I don’t want my business to struggle next year”. change to “I want my business to flourish next year”. This is stating your goal TOWARD what you want to achieve.As your coach, it is my goal to help you achieve your goals. If you are serious about what you want in 2009 please contact me. stephen@performance-coach.co.uk

It never ceases to amaze me how many people cite Edwin Lefevre’s 1922 book “Reminiscences of a Stock Operator” as one of their all time favourite books on investing and trading the markets.

I am one of those people. I read this book at least once a year. However busy I am (and I’m pretty bloody busy right now!) I make time to re-read this classic tome.

So what’s all the fuss about? This book was written, as mentioned, in 1922. The author, Edwin Leferve, never traded a stock in his life. It is believed that he based the book upon interviews he did for a newspaper column with the legendary Wall Street trader Jesse Livermore, although Livermore isn’t named in the book. The central character is known as Larry Livingstone, and the book is his story, from rags to riches and back again, several times.

So it’s a story about a trader who made and lost loads of money almost 100 years ago. So what’s the relevance?

I’ve wanted to make this a blog subject for a while now, so when I re-read the book this time around I highlighted the “gems” that I considered were totally relevant to today’s markets. Here’s a few:

On the second page: “…there is nothing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again”.

If you look at our previous Blog article on the sentiment cycle you will see that we firmly subscribe to this view; that what we’re going through right now is NOTHING NEW.

We need the market to stop trying to pick bottoms and for those same bottom pickers to give up and turn outright bearish before we can make a bottom. The market needs to feel discouragement; tired of trying to find the bottom, resigned to the fact that we can head lower to who knows where. Then we’ll start to rally!!

How about this one; “…I never argue with the tape. Getting sore at the market doesn’t get you anywhere.”

Or this; “…there is only one side to the stock market; and it is not the bull side or the bear side, but the right side”

How about “..in losing money I have gained experience and accumulated a lot of valuable don’ts”

Gems, all of them. New traders: You have to realise that you will make mistakes. Just make sure they don’t cost you your account. And learn from these mistakes. And “don’t” make the same mistakes over and over.

A classic problem traders of all levels of experience encounter is running losses but not running profits.

“They say you never grow poor taking profits. No you don’t. But neither do you grow rich taking a four point profit in a bull market”.

“It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight.”

One of the hardest things to do is to run a winning trade, beleive it or not, but when you’ve got trends akin to the sort of thing we’ve seen in Oil this year the real money has been made by staying short all the way back down from $147 (or $135, which is where we turned bearish).

I could go on and on, but I’m going to tie things up with a quote that is poetically relevant in the current climate, and adds weight to my loudest recurring rant of 2008: “Stop trying to pick bottoms”.

“One of the most helpful things that anybody can learn is to give up trying to catch the last eighth - or the first. These two are the most expensive eights in the world”.

Thank you Mr Livermore/Livingston. I couldn’t have said it better myself!

As usual, keep safe in these markets,

Cheers,

Clive.