Below are some “general thoughts” on the FTSE that I sent out to our “Pro” client base this morning:

I was sticking with the trend until yesterday, and looking for levels like 5400 in FTSE Futures and 1127 in the S&P Futures to hold firm. Alas they didn’t.

Obama changed all that.

At the same time as being bullish at the start of this year, I have mentioned to many of you that I’m looking for a pullback some time this year that will take us back to somewhere like 4750 or even 4250.

Is this it? Let’s look at the last two sell offs; the 23^rd October – 3^rd November move, and the 23^rd-27^th November sell off. The first of these shed 317 points on the Futures, the latter 299.

So far from high to low this time we’ve lost 314 points - very similar, suggesting we could be in dip buying territory.

We won’t need to wait long to find out, and for now I would be getting defensively positioned because the risk of a swift move is with the bears. In the coming sessions we will likely either grind higher (and the bear threat alert will lessen considerably once 5341 is retaken) or we will sell off through 5245 which will make this move bigger than anything we’ve seen so far, and therefore “the real deal”…

The latest appearance by Clive on CNBC:

Weekly Roundup, 19^th to 23^rd October.

Last week was a fairly mixed affair, particularly in Equity markets. The FTSE’s range for the week was 5166- 5299, and Friday saw the top end of this retested just before the US Markets opened, which triggered some afternoon selling. Quite often Friday afternoon sees traders tidying up positions that they’ve been holding all week, so if the market is long then you see selling on Friday afternoon as some of these longs are trimmed.

As far as individual stocks are concerned Miners and Resource stocks are still amongst the leaders, whereas Bank Stocks have been having a much tougher time. The “strong” banks like HSBC and Standard Bank are the safest bets for longs. We are seeing Utility Stocks finding support and starting to turn now and this is something that often happens at tops, with the real money moving into safe havens. We suggested buying United Utilities and Shire Pharma to our clients last week, which gives a clue as to our thinking. We are starting to short consumer related stocks as their charts are starting to agree that we are still in recession and things aren’t really improving.

The Dow has, as we suspected, shown a complete disregard for 10000, but we do seem to be having trouble getting through 10110-120, where we topped out each and every day last week. We are happy with our current “cautiously bullish” stance, and we continue to advise our clients not to get too excited about the prospects for higher prices.

Gold continues to go sideways, frustrating all of those who have piled in And got long because we got through $1000. We always thought $1034 was more important, and we’re happy to be long of this while this important technical level is holding firm.

In last week’s round up we talked about the change in skew we’ve been forced into in Oil. We had been favouring the bears but then we got above $75 to change our stance. Sure enough this has continued higher, and we want to see $78 holding now to give us a launch pad for a move to $90 and beyond.

Finally can I remind you it’s the World Money Show at the end of the week and we’re going to be exhibiting. We are running a competition to win an Apple iPod 3G, so if you can make it please come along and say hello.

Click here to register for free.

To request a free trial, with no obligation, of FuturesTechs’ daily analysis service please click here.

Have a good week,

The FuturesTechs Team.

Every week we send out a weekly round up e-mail to our database, and we figured it would probably be useful to post it here as well, so here goes!

FuturesTechs Weekly Round up - 19th October.

Here is your latest roundup of price movements on the major asset classes in the Investment arena. As regular readers will know by now we at FuturesTechs only look at the price action to determine what trend an instrument is in, and where this suggests it can head in the future. Many technicians use Cycle analysis to make longer term calls, and this is what allowed us to make the “call” that we were near a bottom back in March for Equity markets like the FTSE and DAX. Currently our analysis suggests there is a pullback imminent, but so far each time the market has threatened this sort of move the buyers have stepped back in and bought into the dips. There was some price action towards the tail end of last week that was slightly worrying, but once again the bulls appear to have averted the threat.

The Dow may be above 10000 as we write, but it’s failing to convince and we prefer maintaining a cautious stance for now. I heard a great line on the financial news channels last week. Someone said they were “at the party, but dancing near the door”. That sums up how we feel about the present state of things.

So we’d warn against getting too complacent about this recent rise, and we’d warn against worrying that you’ve missed the boat. Generally tops are formed when people pile in thinking they’ve got to get in because they’ll miss out otherwise!! If our analysis is right there will be a pullback soon, and it could even be a deep one, and just when people think we’re heading back to those March lows is just the time you want to be buying!

Gold has been front and centre on people’s minds of late, and the amount of mainstream press it’s been getting (all bullish) worries us, as far as whether this rally can sustain itself is concerned. BUT it has held above some important technical support levels like the $1027 to $1034 region, so we are happy to stay with the trend and back it to keep heading higher for now.

Oil has been the one that has surprised us. We weren’t expecting to see $75 again in a hurry but we’re above here at present, so now there’s scope for higher prices and we’ve been forced to readjust our thinking.

The Dollar’s weakness is the other big topic that many have had on their minds of late. We are keeping a particularly close eye on Dollar/Yen, actually, and want to see a move through 91.15 to take further pressure off the dollar.

Finally just a reminder that we are exhibiting at the World Money Show this year. It takes place at the QE2 Conference Centre in London (bang opposite Big Ben) on October 30^th and 31^st. Admission is free, so register and be sure to come along and say hello. Click here to register

If you wish to benefit from our analysis on a daily basis it is just £50 a month (+VAT). You can become a member by clicking here.

Have a good week,

The FuturesTechs Team.

I thought it would be a bit of fun to ask our Professional client base for their favourite market-related catchphrases, and to do a Blog thereon.

There were two things that I didn’t realise when I embarked upon this idea. Firstly that there are so many that are rude, and therefore may be tough to incorporate into such a blog, but secondly that so many had valuable lessons for any trader ingrained into their meaning.

So here’s a few, and I hope you enjoy this piece, as well as possibly get something out of it!

By far and away the one that came put top was (and I really hope this doesn’t offend anyone) “Don’t be a dick for a tick”. Clearly many of my clients have spent many a year working a 15 bid on something only for the market to trade down to 16 then set off on a stonking rally. It is one of the hardest things to deal with as a trader. I’d say it’s probably harder once you’re in a position and looking to get out. Putting an offer in at 30 because FuturesTechs has a level there, only to find out later that it traded 1000 lots at 29 but never got to trade 30 is highly frustrating, especially if this means a potential profit ends up being a scratch or worse.

The next one that really seemed to feature amongst answers given was something to do with what “Bottom Pickers” get. Apparently this isn’t a very fulfilling pastime. I couldn’t agree more, at least where the market is concerned!! Those who try to buy at the very bottom of a move often get in bother. Whenever I do seminars with people who are new to the City or trading I always try and convey the idea of trading in the direction of the Trend. Markets that are plummeting lower can often keep doing the same for longer than you can stay in your long trade. Actually that was a John Maynard Keynes quote: “The markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”. This whole debate doesn’t stop at one catchphrase though. There were plenty of candidates. “Don’t try and catch a falling knife”, or the one I heard in October 2008 “Don’t try and catch a falling fridge”. What you really should try and do is remember that “The Trend is your Friend”. Just be careful of the “Dead Cat Bounce” though, and don’t worry too much about those who tell you to “Sell in May and Go Away” – well not this year anyway!

This sort of trading is akin to “Picking up Pennies in front a Steam Roller”. Often people lose so much money on these sorts of ventures that they end up with a “Trade that turns into an Investment”. This is why we need to have stops, as long as we use them. “Stops are for buses” is on the “what not to do” catchphrase list, along with “double up to catch up” and “Don’t get out unless it’s a winner” (Very naughty!).

The better advice for stopping out trades may be that “The first cut is the cheapest”. If you end up in a losing trade it’s best to own up and take the loss. Don’t “stick it in the bottom drawer”, after all “Denial is not just a large river in Egypt”!

Trading psychology seems to enter the equation for a few phrases as well. The ones that cropped up a few times in our little survey were “Don’t get high on your own supply”, “Don’t get too long of yourself” and “Don’t believe your own publicity”. They all say the same thing, and it’s a really valuable lesson for any trader at any time of their career. The market is the most fantastic leveller, it seems!

Finally special mention needs to go to the following responses.

“More Shorts than the front row at a Wham concert” made me chuckle, as did “He who finesses, wears frilly dresses”, “Scratching is for DJ’s”, and “If you want to hedge get a Garden”.

Many thanks to all who proffered replies. It certainly made my Columbus Day go a bit quicker!

Have a good week all.

Cheers,

Clive.

Markets are often very quiet in August. Although 2007 and 2008 proved an exception to this rule, 2009 seems to be reverting to type. Maybe the Cricket’s got something to do with it, at least in the UK.

I can imagine the UK stock market could be very quiet today as we all watch to see whether our 300-odd for 8 is a good score. I afforded myself the afternoon off yesterday to sit down and watch the first day, and personally I felt that the pitch wasn’t quite as favourable for batting as usual Oval pitches, but we’ll have to wait until the Aussies bat to find that out, I guess!

Anyway, still in Cricket mode I was asked by a journalist friend for a quote on the Footsie this morning. Here’s what I furnished the poor chap!

“During the week just gone the market has once again held above key support at 4608-14.5 (looking at the Sep Futures here), and all the time this is the case we’re going to stick with the bulls, and look for a move through 4778 to 4831 then 4919.5 then 5000.

If our important support level at 4608 did give way we could quickly see an unraveling of the rally seen in the last few weeks of July.

Maybe England winning the Ashes will be the catalyst for the upside break so we’ll have to wait until Monday. Now that is the ramblings of a mad man!  The most likely scenario is an Australian win and a continuation of boring uncertain, rangy price action in the FTSE until after Labour Day at the start of September. Trying to “pick” direction for Equity indices in August can often be a thankless task, so I know how Andrew Strauss feels”.

Have a good weekend. Best of luck to England! And let’s hope England can make it through to Monday so I can watch another stunning conclusion a la 2005. I am at the V Festival all weekend, so don’t want to miss the excitement…. unless the Aussies roll us over, then I don’t care!

In the meantime if you want a no obligation free trial of our daily analysis please click here and ask. If you don’t ask, you don’t get!!

COME ON ENGLAND!

Cheers,

Clive.

Here is Clive’s latest appearance:

Clive has recently started a weekly slot on CNBC, where he’ll be explaining concepts in technical analysis and reviewing the current state of play in the markets. Tune in on Thursdays from around 6:30am, or check our archives.

Here is today’s appearance, discussing Marabuzo lines in the context of what’s been happening recently with the FTSE, S&P 500, Bund and Brent.

It’s not often Technical Analysis gets a good rap in the national press. I think this is because journalists like to write stories about the markets, so need a reason to explain a move in a particular stock or market, rather than just a plain old “more buyers than sellers” response.

But to be fair the journalist community is getting better (as are the Economists and Academics). Most people do appreciate the value of Technical Analysis, even if some don’t want to admit it!

This week saw an article published  in The Times, written by the highly respected and well read Anatole Kaletsky.

I’m probably not meant to reproduce it in a “cut and paste” style here so I won’t. I’ll give you the link to their website, after I’ve reproduced one or two lines to give you a taster!

“The fact is that the so-called fundamentals that preoccupy media commentators, central bankers and politicians rarely determine market directions on a daily, weekly or even monthly basis”. - Check!!

“…..according to a study by the New York Federal Reserve Bank, “nearly all” currency traders use technical models, which means that some, although not all, must produce consistently useful results”. - true.

“A second reason for taking technical analysis seriously is that its main rationale makes sense”. - here here!!

“A third attractive feature of technical analysis is that its success refutes the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), which has led economists astray for the past 30 years in their efforts to understand financial markets” - BINGO!!!

So here’s the link, and for once I’m going to shut up and let someone else do the talking!

Thank you, Anatole!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/article6728286.ece

Cheers,

Clive.

‘Sell in May and go away, come again on St. Leger’s Day’, or so the ancient wisdom goes. According to convention, investors do well by exiting the stock markets during the quiet summer months, only returning in mid-September.

Not satisfied with old wives’ tales here at FuturesTechs Towers, we decided to do a little bit of empirical research and find out for ourselves if this had worked in years gone by.

In order to spice it up a little bit, and to add some “timing” to the whole affair, we also decided to consider the amendment offered by another technician (the excellent and well-respected Axel Rudolph at Dow Jones): “Sell in May and go away, come again on St. Leger’s Day so long as there is a Stochastic crossover sell signal.” Ooh-err!

The results?

It turns out that this rule hasn’t been too bad at all, looking back for the last 20 years.

We put the start of the summer period as the day of the first Stochastic crossover sell signal in May or, if there was none, as May 31^st. The end of the summer was defined as the day of the St. Leger Stakes, the horse racing meet in Doncaster that’s been running since the 18^th century, and which is always held in mid-September. We use the Slow Stochastic indicator with the typical parameters.

So here’s a simple comparison: the returns for each of the last twenty years (blue) versus the annualised returns for each summer (red):

Fig 1.

The chart shows that the red series was quite a bit lower than the blue series on a couple of occasions (1992, 1998, 2001, 2002, for example), meaning that summer returns were much worse than the annual returns in each of those years. And we also see that the years in which the summer significantly outperformed the year as a whole weren’t very common.

So now let’s compare the same annual returns versus the returns achieved by sitting out during the summer period (selling in May and coming back in September). The annual returns are in blue again, with the returns from the “Sell in May” strategy in purple:

Fig 2.

This shows that the returns from sitting out for the summer months were better than for the year as a whole in 1990, 1992, 1998, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007 and 2008.

What’s also going on here, though, is that the returns from summer were greater than zero for 11 of the 20 years in question, so that for each of these years you were better off staying invested rather than sitting out. Even if the summer returns weren’t that great, they were better than the zero gained by doing nothing for that time.

In general, though, the records show that there has been some good success in leaving the fray for summer, as illustrated by this summary:

1989-2008                          Average Returns

Annual                                      6.03%

Summer (annualised)          -1.03%

Sell in May Strategy                7.39%

The average return for each of the past 20 years has been 6.03% but, by employing the Sell in May strategy, the average return rises to 7.38%. The average of the annualised returns for the summers has actually been negative.

Now let’s look at the suggested amendment to the rule, and use the Stochastic sell signal. We find that when you only sell out in the years when there was a sell signal, the strategy does improve a little. This is illustrated by Figure 3, where we simply stayed invested for the years when there was no signal:

Fig 3.

Waiting for a Stochastic sell signal meant that you would still have been protected from summer losses in 1990, 1992, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007 and 2008 (you would have suffered pretty big losses last year anyway, of course). This strategy performed worse than simply staying invested for the year in 1989, 1991, 1993, 1995, 1997 and 2005. The average return from this strategy, however, is still an improvement on simply selling out (which was already an improvement on staying invested):

1989-2008                                  Average Return

Annual                                             6.03%

Sell in May                                      7.39%

Sell Signal Strategy                      7.49%

Looking exclusively at the years when there was a sell signal, the worst return (except for 2008) was -3%! Some people might consider this to be good value risk management, even if it means missing out on some growth during good years

Our summary box looking only at the years with a sell signal helps to prove how the rule made a big difference:

Sell Signal Years                     Average Return

Annual                                              5.75%

Summer (annualised)                  -3.64%

Sell in May Strategy                         8.01%

This isn’t a very formal analysis, of course, but could be worth thinking about. In terms of this year, we had a Stochastic sell signal for the FTSE on the 13^th of this month (the vertical line on the chart below).

Fig 4: Stochastic sell signal for the FTSE-100 index, 13^th May 2009

The market has gained a little more since the signal, but anybody who thinks that the rally is probably over now might take encouragement from the historical record of weak summer trading. That would make this an opportunity to get out, only coming back for race day in Doncaster next autumn.

Graham Neary (graham@futurestechs.co.uk)