FuturesTechs Blog

Last week’s big highlight was meant to be the US Employment Report. As it turned out all the action was before this, and the numbers were a bit of a damp squib (like the topical analogy there?).

Equity markets have caught a fresh bid, and we were early to catch this as there were several reversal patterns on major indices at the start of last week. We were bullish from Wednesday onwards, so have reaped some firm rewards on the back of that timely change of sides.

Most of our readers are short term traders so they benefit from these timely “calls”. Longer term traders and Investors may be on the sidelines waiting for an opportunity to get in, and coming out of a dip or retracement is an ideal opportunity. Often, as was the case last week, our charts can tell us nice and early if it’s likely that a pullback has come to an end.

We are now looking to see if resistance at 5300 in the FTSE Index will be seen off. If this  happens the next upside target is 5650, a failure high from last August.

Gold is on another big run at the moment and has traded up to a high of $1111 as of yesterday morning. Yesterday’s candlestick (A “Shooting Star”) gave a warning that things may be getting toppy at these levels but so far we haven’t seen any downside moves to confirm this, so we’re sticking to the idea of higher prices going forward, targeting $1192 next, then $1250.

Oil is stuck in a range for now. Brent Crude has traded between $75 and $80 for weeks now. We expect this range to get broken with a move higher, and we would then target $90 and beyond. We have been suggesting to our clients to buy the dips to $75, and whatever their timeframe this has worked out well. Longer term holders would never have been offside, whereas those who trade in and out should have been able to jump out at $78 to $80 on several occasions then buy again at £75 next time it comes off.

If you are uncertain of any of the terminology used or methodologies discussed in this report you could swot up on our website. Feel free to ask for a Free Trial by clicking here.

Yours,

The FuturesTechs Team

Weekly Roundup, 19^th to 23^rd October.

Last week was a fairly mixed affair, particularly in Equity markets. The FTSE’s range for the week was 5166- 5299, and Friday saw the top end of this retested just before the US Markets opened, which triggered some afternoon selling. Quite often Friday afternoon sees traders tidying up positions that they’ve been holding all week, so if the market is long then you see selling on Friday afternoon as some of these longs are trimmed.

As far as individual stocks are concerned Miners and Resource stocks are still amongst the leaders, whereas Bank Stocks have been having a much tougher time. The “strong” banks like HSBC and Standard Bank are the safest bets for longs. We are seeing Utility Stocks finding support and starting to turn now and this is something that often happens at tops, with the real money moving into safe havens. We suggested buying United Utilities and Shire Pharma to our clients last week, which gives a clue as to our thinking. We are starting to short consumer related stocks as their charts are starting to agree that we are still in recession and things aren’t really improving.

The Dow has, as we suspected, shown a complete disregard for 10000, but we do seem to be having trouble getting through 10110-120, where we topped out each and every day last week. We are happy with our current “cautiously bullish” stance, and we continue to advise our clients not to get too excited about the prospects for higher prices.

Gold continues to go sideways, frustrating all of those who have piled in And got long because we got through $1000. We always thought $1034 was more important, and we’re happy to be long of this while this important technical level is holding firm.

In last week’s round up we talked about the change in skew we’ve been forced into in Oil. We had been favouring the bears but then we got above $75 to change our stance. Sure enough this has continued higher, and we want to see $78 holding now to give us a launch pad for a move to $90 and beyond.

Finally can I remind you it’s the World Money Show at the end of the week and we’re going to be exhibiting. We are running a competition to win an Apple iPod 3G, so if you can make it please come along and say hello.

Click here to register for free.

To request a free trial, with no obligation, of FuturesTechs’ daily analysis service please click here.

Have a good week,

The FuturesTechs Team.

We included the RSI and Parabolic SAR indicators in the new levels sheet available in our Members Area, so thought that it would be worthwhile to briefly introduce them to anyone who might not be familiar with how they worked or how to use them.

Fig 1: The New Levels Sheet. (Click to enlarge)

RSI (Relative Strength Index)

One of the most popular oscillators, the Relative Strength Index was first introduced by J. Welles Wilder in his popular, now-classic book, “New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems” (Trend Research, 1978).

The calculation might not look intuitive, but it really isn’t too complicated:

where RS is the “Relative Strength” of up days versus down days over the period being used (typically fourteen).

As originally calculated by Welles Wilder, the strength of up days is calculated as follows: for each day, “Up” is recorded as: the difference between the close and the prior close if there was on increase, or as zero if there wasn’t. “Down” is recorded similarly: the size of the difference between the close and prior close (always a positive number) if it decreased, or zero if it didn’t. The exponential moving averages of “Up” and “Down” are calculated, with the EMA of “Up” then divided by EMA of “Down” to give us the Relative Strength.

RSI is bounded in the range 0-100, and the use of the exponential moving averages makes it reasonably smooth, solving two issues which often arise with oscillators (for example: the simple Momentum indicator - the difference between latest close price and the price n periods ago - is neither smooth nor bounded, making for volatile swings which can’t be compared across markets).

The key takeaways from RSI are:

The ideas that hold true for oscillators in general hold true with the RSI. The oscillator will frequently turn around before the price does – for example, a price still rising that is accompanied by a falling RSI produces a bearish divergence between price and oscillator, a major warning that the up trend is running out of steam (see Fig 2 below).

Fig 2: NASDAQ Futures, September 1999 – May 2000. Divergence between price and RSI at the height of the bubble. (Click to enlarge)

It’s worth reinforcing that extreme RSI readings do not by themselves constitute buy or sell signals. For example, the most that a high RSI, even one above 70, can indicate is that if the market is ranging, it is now due for a correction. The sell signal won’t actually be produced until RSI starts declining back toward neutral levels, and if the market is trending instead of ranging, then it could stay at elevated levels for extended periods of time. As with any indicator, trader discretion is advised.

When looking at our levels sheets, simply checking whether the RSI is above or below 50 tells you something about the internal strength of that market. Additionally, we highlight the figure in yellow if it is in one of the extreme overbought/ oversold zones. A cluster of extreme overbought/oversold markets in the same sector of our equities, commodities or Forex sheets provides interesting information about general market trends, while also helping us to identify specific opportunities.

Parabolic SAR

Another invention by Welles Wilder, the Parabolic Stop-and-Reverse is designed as a trailing stop system with a difference. Originally called the Parabolic Time/Price System, the stop is calculated as function of price and time.

The SAR alternates between providing stops for shorts and longs, switching as soon as a stop is activated. In the chart above, the blue marks are the stops for shorts, with the red marks the stops for longs. As you can see, this system is “always in”, meaning that it always indicates an uptrend or a downtrend (depending on which type of stop was the last one to be activated), so that somebody who focused exclusively on it would always have a position in the market. This makes it unsuitable for ranging markets, where a trader using it would be constantly whipsawed (see Fig 3 below).

Figure 3: NASDAQ Futures, January - May 2009. Whipsawed until mid-February, and then helpfully following the trends. (Click to enlarge)

The stop is calculated by:

Today’s SAR = (Yesterday’s SAR) + (Acceleration Factor)*(Yesterday’s Extreme Price – Yesterday’s SAR),

where yesterday’s extreme price is the high in a downtrend, or the low in an uptrend, and the Acceleration Factor is a fraction which increases incrementally each day up to a maximum value, providing the distinctive parabolic shape (this is the part of the formula incorporating time).

The recommended use of the Parabolic SAR is as a stop in a trending market where other, primary tools of analysis have originally motivated the trade. The stops which it provides won’t rush to the price action too quickly at the start of a serious move, thus giving it some initial time in which to develop. However, the increasing “Acceleration Factor” means that it will pick up speed when it isn’t activated, until it races quickly towards the price. This means that when the trend does eventually lose momentum, it will quickly catch up with the price and close out the trade.

Our levels sheets provide the SAR stop in green if it’s the stop in an uptrend, or in red if it’s the stop in a downtrend. Again, simply browsing which sectors are predominantly in uptrends or downtrends according to the SAR provides useful information, even if you aren’t using the stops in trading a specific market.

A Note on Parameters

Note that as with all indicators, the parameters of the RSI and the Parabolic SAR can be tailored to suit the individual markets under consideration. Our levels sheets use the most commonly used parameters for each indicator (14 periods for the RSI, an acceleration factor of .02*(t) up to a maximum of .2 for the Para SAR), for the same reason that we look at 10, 20 and 50-day moving averages: besides being reasonable parameters to use most of the time in their own right, they are the parameters that a majority of people automatically use anyway, and therefore gain technical significance purely on that basis.

Other Indicators, Other Markets?

The levels sheets are there to assist our members and if there are particular indicators and/or markets which you would like to receive automated levels for, please let us know and we’ll do our best to include them. While automated indicators and levels are never going to be a trader’s panacea, when incorporated into an overall strategy they are a key ingredient of successful trading.

Graham Neary (graham@futurestechs.co.uk)

Fibonacci retracements have worked like a dream of late in the Dow, and they’re currently causing our recent bullishness a bit of trouble. Let’s first of all reproduce the commentary we’ve put out today for the Dow:

Now lets go through that and work out what Fibonacci has got to do with it. We have several articles on this blog and in our Website members area concerning Fibonacci so this time round I’ll just assume that you’re happy with the idea that when a market is in recovery mode it quite often recovers 38.2% or 61.8% of the previous move. The sell off from January 6th to March 6th took us from 9048 to 6460. The 38.2% retrace of this move is 7450. See how this featured as a target once we started rallying. The 61.8% retrace of this same move is 8060. This, again referencing back to our commentary, was the next target once 7450 was seen off. We hit this level today. In fact it’s the high of the day. This is a slight worry. This may be just a temporary “blip”, and this is how we’ll treat it for now. But there is now a chance we can move back to 7450, and if this level were to break we’d have to forget being bullish and look for further weakness, back to 7071. We don’t expect any selling from here to get below 7450, let alone 7071 (for lots of other reasons besides the Fibonacci work). But If it did we’re totally wrong about the March low being THE low. You can see the symmetry of these numbers in harmony from the charts we’ve posted. Because today’s high is BANG ON the 61.8% retracement of the Jan-Mar sell-off, the 38.2% retrace of the recovery is EXACTLY THE SAME as the old 38.2% retrace (of the Jan-March selling): 7449. One last interesting thing that will shape the bigger picture outlook: The 38.2% retrace of the selling seen between May 2008 and March 9th is up at 9012. And what is the year’s high from January, the start of the last big down-leg? 9048… Making for a pretty important area of resistance, wouldn’t you say? Have a good week.

One of the features we added when we made the free suite of levels is a collection of moving averages for each market we cover. These complement the pivot points and market profile levels which we had already been providing on a daily basis.

The moving averages are on 3 different timeframes: 10-day, 20-day and 50-day. We colour these numbers green when the 10-day is higher than the 20-day and the 20-day is higher than the 50-day, or red if the 10-day is lower than the 20-day and the 20-day is lower than the 50-day.

But why do technicians look at moving averages? The simplest way to put it is that the moving average is a smoothed trendline, and one of the most efficient ways of grasping the trend of any market. Unlike other technical tools (candlesticks and chart patterns, for example), the moving average is not designed to be an immediate predictor of future price action or key pivot points (though it does sometimes provide support and resistance levels). Instead, its job is to gives us a handle on the longer-term price direction. On the basis that trends tend to persist, aligning ourselves with this direction is usually to our advantage.

We use “simple” moving averages: this means that for the 10-day MA, for example, we simply calculate the average of the closing prices of the previous 10 days. There are other types of moving average (linearly weighted, exponential, etc.) which assign greater importance to more recent closing prices, or include data from all previous days using various different formulations for weighting the data, but the simple average remains the most commonly used.

As a lagging indicator, the moving average doesn’t react as soon as the price begins to trend, and it doesn’t reverse as soon as the trend changes course either. But in return for missing out on the exact start and finish of a trend, we get a measure of direction which doesn’t get knocked out by immediate fluctuations, helping us to stay true to the longer-term moves and resist trading too frequently.

There are a couple of variables which go into the makeup of the moving average. Apart from selecting which type of average to use, as already mentioned, we also need to choose the timeframe and the price to be entered into the calculation. While most people think that closing price is the most meaningful number as compared to the opening price or some other figure, there is no strong consensus about the choice of timeframe. The trade-off in this decision is between significance and responsiveness. A longer-period timeframe will certainly avoid being whipsawed and stay with the biggest moves, but it will also spend a great amount of time on the losing side when a trend changes course. A shorter-period timeframe will much better react to changes in trend, but will also get whipsawed more frequently and suggest more losing trades when there is a relatively weak trend.

One way to combine the best of both worlds is to use more than one moving average on the same chart. We can then look at moving average crossovers as buy and sell signals: when a shorter-term moving average crosses the long-term equivalent from below, we get a buy signal, and when it crosses from above, we get a sell signal.

This can work beautifully in markets with a well-defined trend. Using 10-week and 20-week moving averages to trade Brent crude oil, we would have got a buy signal on 19^th March, 2007 (closing price that day at $63.20), a sell signal on 25^th August 2008 (at $115.17), and a buy signal today (closing price somewhere around $52).

The problems arise in a trendless or choppy market, where the dangers of getting whipsawed increase and relying on moving averages can lead to ruination.

Suppose we tried to use 10-day and 20-day MAs to trade Brent crude in 2009, and in the most naïve way imaginable. How would it have worked out so far?

The horror show above doesn’t prove that these timeframes won’t work in the future (a rally from here could make the recent buy signal at $43.90 look inspired) but it does prove that they were the wrong timeframes to use over this trading period.

The lesson is that moving averages, as with any other indicator, must be used appropriately for the market under consideration, and in combination with other indicators and insights.

What we provide on our levels sheet are the 10-day, 20-day and 50-day MAs for the markets we cover, allowing members to get a feel for the price location in comparison to a decent selection of averages. As mentioned above, we point to the bullish or bearish alignment of these averages by highlighting them green when the 10-day is higher than the 20-day and the 20-day is higher than the 50-day, or red if the 10-day is lower than the 20-day and the 20-day is lower than the 50-day. Some traders who want to ride confirmed medium-term trends will wait for this kind of ultra-strong triple alignment before taking a position. The extreme case is when the price and moving averages are all aligned, and all moving in the same direction. Now that’s a trend!

But here’s a chart of the FTSE Index over the past 10 months, with the 10-day (red), 20-day (blue) and 50-day (black) MAs included, another example of the potential outcomes when using just one indicator:

Following the signals, and only closing out our positions when the moving averages turned to neutral, would have been great for the two downward moves in the first half of this chart. However, it also would have proved costly during the ranging market from November to January, which produced three false signals. To avoid being topped and tailed, we’d have to change the exit strategy during this time in order to take our profits much more quickly – something the moving averages will not help us to do. But the momentum of the averages should still be enough in most cases to ensure that the action continues in our direction for at least a few more points. Our level of confidence in the ability of the market to trend, combined with short-term indicators, should help to advise us on the correct course of action.

The point is that if you want to trade in the direction of a big trend, wait until you get the green or red highlights on our summary page. If the numbers are black, then there is simply no reason to get involved (at least, not from the point of view of the moving averages).

In the coming weeks and months we’ll be expanding the resources offered on our website to include exclusive files for our members covering new markets and new indicators. If there are particular markets or indicators you’d like us to cover, please let us know. For now, we hope you enjoy the levels sheet and find that the addition of the moving averages contributes to your successful trading!

Graham Neary (graham@futurestechs.co.uk)

We often get asked “How can I use your product?”

FuturesTechs provides support and resistance levels to professional traders across a range of different Futures markets. They use our levels as the basis of their day trading.

Unfortunately I often come across traders using them in different ways, so it’s tough to give a definitive answer to that question. We are all different, and do things in different ways, and the individual’s interpretation of the levels we produce is no exception.

Let me make something clear right now. A lot of what we do here at FuturesTechs is basic common sense. We are almost “reporting” the technical news.

Take today’s FTSE Futures price action as an example. In our report this morning we talked about how important resistance at 4220 was, and we made this a bold level to make sure our readers got the message!

It was a VERY obvious level, being Friday’s high: Quite simple, unless you decided to ignore the simple and obvious.

It gave us the high this morning, not once but twice.

The low between these two highs was 4174, so we got a sell signal (Double Top) on the short term (eg 10 minute) charts once this gave way. We had 4163 posted as our first support, so on the way back down (if you hadn’t sold at the bold resistance at 4220) there were two more opportunities to sell; once we broke 4174, or even safer once we sold off through 4163.

Where to get out? We had a bold “area” of support at S5 in today’s report, between 4051.5 and 4064.5. The lunchtime low was 4066.5, where we suddenly started posting reversal candlestick on our trusty 10 minute chart - time to cash in.

Hopefully this gives some insight into how one can use technical levels to help decide where you put on trades, and where you get out.

Ideally you should aim to create trades with a basic set of criteria.

• Trade in the direction of the overall trend.

In other words In a downtrend sell ahead of an important resistance with a tight stop if it breaks.

Buy ahead of a key support level in a rising market.

• Targets should be acheivable, especially considering the current market conditions. It is Martin Luther King Day in the US today, so large swings of volatility are unlikely.

• Targets should also not be “blocked” by large resistance or support levels. For example if you decide to buy a Stock at £1.03 with a stop at 99p then you want to have a target of at least £1.11, to give a 2:1 reward to risk ratio: You are planning to make twice as much as you’re willing to lose - the way it should always be.

But if £1.10 is an old high on several occasions it is hopeful at best to ask the market to trade £1.11, so you have set a target that’s going to be tough to achieve.

Whenever you’re looking for trades to put on you want to try and skew things so that it’s going to be tough to get stopped out, but much easier to head to your target.

This doesn’t mean you’re not ever going to get stopped out, it just means you’re stacking the odds in your favour. This is what Technical Analysis does, and what we hope to help YOU to do when you use our service for YOUR trading decisions.

And one last thing while we’re talking about stops. RESPECT YOUR STOP. It is very easy to move a stop further away if a market’s getting near to triggering your loss. If you have set a stop, then LEAVE IT WHERE IT IS!

So far 2009 has been a tough year to call. Volatility has dropped, but we haven’t gained any firm directional traction yet in most anything. Although it goes against our usual mode of operation to give longer term calls we are still happy with our overall view for Equity markets for 2009; that we will make a new low in the early part of this year, but end the year quite a bit higher than where we are now…

For this blog post we welcome a guest writer, Stephen Desborough, who has worked in the Futures industry for many years as a trader and is now a Performance Coach. He has helped many traders with his in depth knowledge of methods like NLP, approached from a traders point of view.

stephen@performance-coach.co.uk is his e-mail address if you wish to contact him.

Thanks for your contribution, Steve, and Season Greetings to you all!

Cheers,

Clive.

_____________________________________________________________

As the nights and the year draw in, it is a perfect time to reflect back on 2008. As you look back, hopefully you will be able to relish in your accomplishments and the growth that you have made both professionally and personally.

Did you set any goals for 2008? Did you achieve all of the goals that you set for yourself? If for some reason you’ve fallen short, then ask yourself, “why?”. Is there something that you could have done differently, or is there something that you should have done, but for whatever reason you didn’t?

During this special time of festivities, and a well deserved break, spend some time brainstorming the past year and the year ahead. What do you want to achieve in 2009? What is important to you? What are your goals? How are you going to achieve them?

In 1953, researchers surveyed Yale’s graduating seniors to determine how many of them had specific, written goals for their future. The answer: 3%. Twenty years later, researchers polled the surviving members of the Class of 1953 — and found that the 3% with goals had accumulated more personal financial wealth than the other 97% of the class combined.

Some of the reasons that many of us do not set goals:

• Not being serious about your goals. Until you become completely serious about your goals, your chances of success are limited.
• I don’t know how to clearly set out my goals. “As I don’t know how to do it or what I really want. I wont bother”
• The fear of failure. “What happens if I do not achieve my goals?”
• The fear of success. “How will I cope with success and will other peoples perception of me change”

If you have no goals, you are not going anywhere. This is a key reason why people do not achieve their full potential.

So it is important to GAIN DIRECTION IN YOUR LIFE AND DEFINE YOUR DESTINATION.

Even people who do set goals, do not always get the result that they intended. Here is a technique that will help you towards setting and achieving your goals. The SMART criteria.

• S. The more SPECIFIC, that you make your goals the more chance you have of it happening.
• M. What has to happen ? what do you have to see, feel, to know, so that you can MEASURE your success ? Make sure that your goals are MEANINGFUL to you.
• A. State your goal in the present tense. AS IF you are already living the ACHIEVEMENT of the goal.
• R. Make sure that your goal is REALISTIC to you. What degree of certainty do you have to make this goal happen.
• T. Have a precise TIME of when you will have achieved the goal. Make sure that your goal is what you do want as opposed to what you don’t want. eg. “I don’t want my business to struggle next year”. change to “I want my business to flourish next year”. This is stating your goal TOWARD what you want to achieve.As your coach, it is my goal to help you achieve your goals. If you are serious about what you want in 2009 please contact me. stephen@performance-coach.co.uk

Technical Analysis is an essential tool if you are going to trade using CFDs or Spread Betting.

The vast majority of professional day traders use technical analysis in some way shape or form during their trading day. They are aware what the important technical levels are for the markets that they trade. some do this work themselves, some rely upon services like FuturesTechs, knowing that we’ve got an 8 year track record of providing this information to the bulk of the UK Pro trading community.

Many newbies to trading struggle with how to “structure” a trade. Hopefully we’ll shed some light on this with today’s blog post.

It’s all about the levels, and that’s what we do here at FuturesTechs each day: We look at the levels that the market may be looking at, where things may change, where the buyers may return after a sell-off, where the sellers may wake up if the market starts to rise. These are commonly known as support and resistance.

Support is the name given to downside levels; prices below here the buyers may have returned previously, or where they may return today. If we fail to hold support levels the bears are obviously dominating; not giving the buyers the chance to defend these key price levels.

Resistance is the name given to price levels above the market where there may be some”action”. Either we’re going to get to these levels and fall over, or the market should see a strong reaction if we break above them.

These levels are quite often something as simple as old highs and lows, however old they are. We have found markets reacting to levels from over 20 years ago. The market has a long memory, and with charts readily available to all and sundry there’s no excuse not to be armed with the important lines in the sand as you head into each trading day.

The best traders in the world react to a bunch of different things to put on their trades: They wait patiently for a piece of news to come out, or for a technical level to break or hold, or for the market to do a certain thing that they’ve been expecting. They wait patiently. Lots of money can be lost doing trades for the sake of it. Boredom or the need to be involved is a dangerous emotion that a trader has to deal with.

There is little point in trading in between technical levels. The levels are created because they are the prices where things changed previously. They are the “action areas”. Why mess around trying to put trades on in “no mans land”? If you want to buy the market, chose a support level and put your buy order at or above there.

If you need somewhere to put a stop order you can again use a technical level.

Here’s an example: We were bearish of the Eurostoxx 50 Futures today despite Friday’s gains. We had a bold resistance level at 2704. Our bold levels are the important ones. So if we’re bearish and the market rallies to a bold resistance we would suggest selling before the level with a stop above it. The high this morning was 2698….

If you had sold at 2690 with a stop ay 2710 (or our next resistance level at 2728, if you want to give it a bit more “breathing space”) you would have got short and never been far offside.

On the same report we have bold supports at 2640 (the overnight gap) then right down at 2467 and 2418.

So this is the bit that isn’t “harry hindsdight”, just in case you want to jump on the idea that I’m writing this after the event: I will look to cover the short trade at 2470, but if we hold 2640 today I would just get out and cover the trade for either a small profit or at worse nothing. I think we need to break 2640 today to give this trade credibility. In other words we are using another bold level (this time a support) to add weight to our trade. If we don’t break below 2640 then maybe the bears aren’t ready to push us lower just now.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE LEVELS.

So If you’re just starting out trading, whether it be with a Spread bet account, or CFD’s, or DMA (Direct market access) I would urge you to make technical analysis part of your daily process, AND TO TRADE THE LEVELS.

Be Careful!

If you are a regular reader of our reports, or if you’ve seen me on CNBC any time in the last few months you’ll know that we’re staying right out of the rush to pick a bottom on this equity market sell-off, a rather thankless task that so many people appear to be happy to do. This is how it works: If you are a market commentator and you’ve been calling the bottom all the way down, you may as well carry on, because at some point you’ll be right. Then you can say for the next three years “I picked the bottom”. It upsets me that these so called experts are happy to continue to give dud advice to people just to try and save their own face.

Here’s something else: The market will only bottom out once all of these people STOP calling it. When the towel is thrown in by the majority, and most commentators start talking about doom and gloom downside targets, is when we’ll get a bottom. Maybe that’s why Hugh Hendry was given an entire hour on Channel 4 last night to pick over the wreckage of the sub-prime crisis. It was a great bit of TV and you can’t but love the man!

As per last week’s Blog on the sentiment cycle, the bottom will most likely come when people give up trying to call it, and when the market resigns itself to a future of pain and misery. So we’re probably not quite there yet…

I looked back at our analysis in 2003 and saw that we were around 400 points off the low before we called started saying bullish things.

The DAX is certainly well off the lows over the past two sessions, on the back of the world’s most spectacular short squeeze. VW shares jumped from 200 Euros to 1000 Euros in two days. I don’t even want to start to explain the ins and outs so here’s a link to the story on Bloomberg’s website.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aWeWGIPhKfnk&refer=europe

The upshot is that Volkswagen has now become the world’s largest company by market cap on the back of a short squeeze. This story will only get bigger (although I don’t think VW’s market cap will!) and we’re bound to hear some fallout in coming days or weeks.

One wry (and somewhat tongue in cheek) observation on this shenanigans: We won’t see a financial stock reacting higher like this in the coming months, because the shorts have been banned…

Finally, In my spare moments right now I am doing something that I force myself to do once a year: I am re-reading “Reminiscences of a Stock Operator” by Edwin Lefevre. THE BEST BOOK EVER ABOUT THE MARKETS. i only got to chapter 1 when I read this quote:

“Another lesson I learned early is that there is nothing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market to-day has happened before and will happen again”.

Say no more…

As always my best advice if you’re trading these markets is “stay safe”.

Cheers,

Clive.

Things have been a bit frantic since the last Blog post, both for myself and the markets! As well as speaking at the IX Investor Show and the Trading Symposium I have also finished the first draft of my up-coming book; “Candlestick Charts. An introduction to using candlestick charts”. I just hope there isn’t someone round at Harriman House right now pulling their hair out wondering how the heck they’re going to make it into a book!

The events were well attended and both pulled in a crowd of around 200 people to listen to my ramblings on Candlesticks.

Having spoken in front of these sort of numbers in seminars, surely today’s appearance on CNBC would be a walk in the park.

But my first appearance on TV turned out to be a rather nerve-racking experience! Let’s hope that was just because it was the first time, and let’s hope they invite me back again.

The other thing I hope is that the calls I made work out okay!

In the Eurostoxx 50 Futures I (rather nervously, with a waver in my voice) said that last weeks break of 3387 spelt trouble, especially since this level turned resistance and capped upside subsequently. This is a key line in the sand and if we can retake this level the hounds can be called off. Otherwise things still look very bleak.

In CME Group Wheat (still called CBOT Wheat by most people despite the recent merger) we’ve seen a failure at a key Fibonacci level (955) in recent days and this now looks set to head lower to retest the year’s low at 730 (trading 845 at the time of writing). I had managed to gather myself a bit by this time and was even starting to make some sense!.

Finally I looked at the Eurex Bund (by this time I was breathing normally and everything) where the short term has been a tad messy, but the Medium Term outlook remains firmly skewed towards the Bears.

Overall I think it went well, and I’m looking forward to the next time I get on there, and this time I’ll tell people beforehand. Today I was more than happy to keep it quiet!!!

Here’s a link if you want to view it…

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=782776257